| From: | Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | daizhong(at)21cn(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bug #621: why postgreSQL stored databases in |
| Date: | 2002-03-18 16:54:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.32.20020318085440.03165100@mail.ok-connect.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
The numbers you see are OID'S, ie the OID of the relation. this is done to
prevent name clashing and also makes fo easy lookups by the backend it self.
At 12:18 PM 3/16/02 -0500, you wrote:
>daizhong (daizhong(at)21cn(dot)com) reports a bug with a severity of 2
>The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
>Short Description
>why postgreSQL stored databases in digital filenames?
>
>Long Description
>In Mysql, database files as tables is stored in alpa. filename,
>but why not postgresql uses digital filename?
>
>Sample Code
>
>
>No file was uploaded with this report
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql-bugs | 2002-03-18 17:18:09 | Bug #622: jdbc driver exception: failed to get datetime field from a table |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-03-18 16:37:42 | Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to |