Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #621: why postgreSQL stored databases in

From: Darcy Buskermolen <darcy(at)wavefire(dot)com>
To: daizhong(at)21cn(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #621: why postgreSQL stored databases in
Date: 2002-03-18 16:54:41
Message-ID: 3.0.32.20020318085440.03165100@mail.ok-connect.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
The numbers you see are OID'S, ie the OID of the relation. this is done to
prevent name clashing and also makes fo easy lookups by the backend it self.



At 12:18 PM 3/16/02 -0500, you wrote:
>daizhong (daizhong(at)21cn(dot)com) reports a bug with a severity of 2
>The lower the number the more severe it is.
>
>Short Description
>why postgreSQL stored databases in digital filenames?
>
>Long Description
>In Mysql, database files as tables is stored in alpa. filename,
>but why not postgresql uses digital filename?
>
>Sample Code
>
>
>No file was uploaded with this report
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: pgsql-bugsDate: 2002-03-18 17:18:09
Subject: Bug #622: jdbc driver exception: failed to get datetime field from a table
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-03-18 16:37:42
Subject: Re: Bug #612: PostgreSQL 7.2 does not build according to

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group