Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Tim Uckun <tim(at)diligence(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
Date: 2000-11-23 15:58:29
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20001123075829.01746100@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

At 09:44 AM 11/21/00 -0700, Tim Uckun wrote:

>What about the php module? Does it take advantage of API?

I don't know. If not, though, there wouldn't be much point in using
AOLserver, since the simple and efficient database API is the main
attraction. So I think there's a pretty good chance it does.

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-23 16:13:28 Re: [HACKERS] Enum type emulation: problem with opaque type in PL/pgSQL functions
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2000-11-23 15:41:57 Re: Trouble With Strings

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-11-23 16:13:28 Re: [HACKERS] Enum type emulation: problem with opaque type in PL/pgSQL functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-23 15:30:44 Re: Please advise features in 7.1