Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments
Date: 2000-10-27 21:57:51
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20001027145751.01856bc4@mail.pacifier.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 12:18 PM 10/27/00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

>Hiroshi was a little concerned about this change in behavior, and
>so the first order of business is whether anyone wants to defend the
>old way?  IMHO it was incontrovertibly a bug, but ...

Sure feels like a bug to me.  Having it ignored isn't what I'd expect.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-27 22:03:55
Subject: Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2000-10-27 21:50:36
Subject: Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group