Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: bhirt(at)mobygames(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Cc: Brian Hirt <bhirt(at)loopy(dot)berkhirt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3
Date: 2000-04-07 00:37:54
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000406173754.01413920@mail.pacifier.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 07:30 PM 4/6/00 -0500, Brian Hirt wrote:

>  This is not normally 
>a problem because I typically check the constrait before updating.  

If true, this is actually a BIG problem since many applications will
catch any error rather than check first, since this is more efficient...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-07 00:58:04
Subject: Re: Unique Key Violation 7.0 vs. 6.5.3
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2000-04-07 00:33:37
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Doc updates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group