From:
Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To:
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Date:
2000-04-06 18:46:40
Message-ID:
3.0.1.32.20000406114640.01402ec0@mail.pacifier.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2000-04-06 11:02:45 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 13:37:25 from Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
2000-04-06 13:49:15 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-06-12 04:01:54 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-06-12 08:44:07 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-06-12 04:02:31 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-06-12 09:30:59 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 14:20:19 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 16:17:49 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 17:33:11 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:05:55 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 18:46:40 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:58:08 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 19:14:01 from Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
2000-04-06 18:06:50 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2000-04-06 18:40:54 from Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>
2000-04-06 18:58:06 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
2000-04-06 18:50:25 from Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches
At 02:05 PM 4/6/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>How do you get around vacuum downtime?
People wait...I guess the point is we want to avoid as much downtime
as possible. Before 6.5 came out with a consistent pg_dump utility,
I was prepared to knock down the site nightly for backups. The
appearance of consistent pg_dumps was a welcome surprise, what can
I say? :)
I posed the question because my assumption was that it wouldn't be
that hard to roll it into pg_dump if it works well and is reliable,
and that this would be desirable.
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net .
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-04-06 18:50:25Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)Previous :From : Karel ZakDate : 2000-04-06 18:40:54Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
pgsql-patches by date
Next :From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-04-06 18:50:25Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)Previous :From : Karel ZakDate : 2000-04-06 18:40:54Subject : Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
