Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 17:11:54
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000406101154.013f8750@mail.pacifier.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:38 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables. Should I show examples
>> > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
>>
>> TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not. Nuff said...
>
>OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

Won't 7.0 be the release version by the time the book is actually
published? :)

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 2000-04-06 17:33:11 Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-04-06 17:10:12 Vacuuming temporary tables