Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT
Date: 2000-01-31 17:45:58
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.20000131094558.00f068ac@mail.pacifier.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 09:41 AM 1/31/00 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote:

>    Of  course,  removing  END/ABORT will touch many applications
>    using transactions, but I would vote  for  it  anyway,  since
>    it's standard.

Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word
used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with?

Of course, removing that would REALLY impact current applications...



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-01-31 18:37:44
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int??
Previous:From: Ed LoehrDate: 2000-01-31 16:32:55
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int??

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group