Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The dangers of "-F"
Date: 1999-06-23 23:24:22
Message-ID: 3.0.1.32.19990623162422.006d7ea8@mail.pacifier.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 02:29 PM 6/23/99 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> I don't know how postgres works internally.  So my question is
>> really "are any such assumptions broken by the use of -F, and
>> does breaking such assumptions lead to a more serious form
>> of failure if there's a crash?"

>It is possible in an OS crash because we don't have any info about what
>order stuff is written to disk with -F.

OK.  This answers my question, thanks.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-06-23 23:38:28
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Perl 5 Interface on 6.5 and lo_creat/lo_open problem
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 1999-06-23 23:03:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] money data type and conversions]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group