Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP

From: Kevin Field <kevinjamesfield(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl error format vs plpgsql error format vs pgTAP
Date: 2009-05-29 11:59:21
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On May 28, 5:19 pm, da(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)kineticode(dot)com ("David E. Wheeler") wrote:
> On May 28, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
> >> Can pgTap check for a regex instead if just a string?
> > That's the other option, if the pgTAP author is willing...if the
> > SQLSTATE thing doesn't work out I guess we'll have to go down that
> > road.
> Patches welcome. ;-)
> I'm getting a new version ready to release as I type.

Thanks, great to know.  :)  Although, I do think changing plperl is
the more proper option, so I'm going to try there first...

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2009-05-29 12:36:41
Subject: Re: Compiler warning cleanup - unitilized const variables, pointer type mismatch
Previous:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2009-05-29 11:52:29
Subject: Re: libpq is not thread safe

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group