On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
> Dear All,
> I'm wondering whether Vacuum/analyse (notably by the autovaccuum daemon) is
> responsible for some deadlocks/dropouts I'm seeing.
> One particular table gets hit about 5 times a second (for single row
> updates and inserts) + associated index changes. This is a very light load
> for the hardware; we have 7 CPU cores idling, and very little disk activity.
> The query normally runs in about 20 ms.
> However, the query must always respond within 200ms, or userspace gets
> nasty errors. [we're routing books on a sorter machine, and the book misses
> its exit opportunity]. Although this is a low load, it's a bit like a
> The question is, could the autovacuum daemon (running either in vacuum or
> in analyse mode) be taking out locks on this table that sometimes cause the
> query response time to go way up (exceeding 10 seconds)?
> I think I've set up autovacuum to do "little and often", using
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay = 20ms
> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit = 20
those are basically thresholds. So in essence you are forcing your
autovacuum to be active pretty often,
And from what I can read here, you are looking for completely opposite
behaviour. Unless you think statistical image of your table will be
completely invalid, after 20 modifications to it, which I am sure is not
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-11-26 16:26:45|
|Subject: Re: Analyse without locking? |
|Previous:||From: Richard Neill||Date: 2009-11-26 16:20:35|
|Subject: Analyse without locking?|