| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages |
| Date: | 2009-11-25 16:33:20 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0911250833s22b92dcah9cf3ccac0421b4bc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov
> wrote:
> Richard Neill <rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> wrote:
>
> > In terms of just index bloat, does a regular vacuum help?
>
> You might want to use the REINDEX command to correct serious index
> bloat. A regular vacuum will make dead space available for re-use,
> but won't eliminate bloat directly. (If run regularly, it will
> prevent bloat.)
>
> for that reason, it makes sense to actually partition your data - even tho
you don't see performance degradation because of data size, but purely
because of nature of data.
Other way, is to perform regular cluster && reindex - but this blocks
relations you are clustering..
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2009-11-25 16:45:46 | Re: RAID card recommendation |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-11-25 16:26:15 | Re: Query times change by orders of magnitude as DB ages |