From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vikul Khosla <vkhosla(at)gridsolv(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Known Bottlenecks |
Date: | 2009-10-19 13:46:58 |
Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0910190646n6dfc8d2fr4e851053a50a0a41@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Vikul Khosla <vkhosla(at)gridsolv(dot)com> wrote:
> Jeff, Robert, I am still working on the "low cardinality" info you
> requested. Please bear with me.
>
> In the meantime, have the following question:
>
> Are there known "scenarios" where certain types of SQL queries perform
> worse in PG
> than they do in ORacle ?
>
> For example, I have observed some discussion where MAX (In Oracle) was
> replaced with ORDER/DESC/LIMIT
> in PG.
>
> I realize this is a loaded question, but it would be great if any of you
> would share some observed
> generalities in this context.
>
other one would be SELECT .. WHERE foo IN (SELECT ...); (use join instead,
and in case of NOT IN , use left join).
--
GJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2009-10-19 13:59:43 | Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns |
Previous Message | Vikul Khosla | 2009-10-19 13:43:06 | Known Bottlenecks |