Re: Known Bottlenecks

From: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vikul Khosla <vkhosla(at)gridsolv(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Known Bottlenecks
Date: 2009-10-19 13:46:58
Message-ID: 2f4958ff0910190646n6dfc8d2fr4e851053a50a0a41@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Vikul Khosla <vkhosla(at)gridsolv(dot)com> wrote:

> Jeff, Robert, I am still working on the "low cardinality" info you
> requested. Please bear with me.
>
> In the meantime, have the following question:
>
> Are there known "scenarios" where certain types of SQL queries perform
> worse in PG
> than they do in ORacle ?
>
> For example, I have observed some discussion where MAX (In Oracle) was
> replaced with ORDER/DESC/LIMIT
> in PG.
>
> I realize this is a loaded question, but it would be great if any of you
> would share some observed
> generalities in this context.
>

other one would be SELECT .. WHERE foo IN (SELECT ...); (use join instead,
and in case of NOT IN , use left join).

--
GJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2009-10-19 13:59:43 Re: Indexes on low cardinality columns
Previous Message Vikul Khosla 2009-10-19 13:43:06 Known Bottlenecks