| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ognjen Blagojevic <ognjen(at)etf(dot)bg(dot)ac(dot)yu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production |
| Date: | 2009-04-10 20:39:56 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0904101339q23ddac3dx21e7e154558184e9@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Yet 1000's of users are running PostgreSQL on Windows in production. It
> really depends on what kind of application you're running, and what its
> demands are. For a CMS or a contact manager or a personnel directory? No
> problem. For a central payroll system for 18,000 employees? I'd use
> Linux.
Confirmed from my experience too.
On top of that, I would like to add - that using it on windows first,
might be a good step ahead. And installing linux on server isn't so
hard anymore, and shouldn't be a problem, unlike 8 years ago :)
Give it a try, and please tell us what sort of application you want to
put on it.
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Glyn Astill | 2009-04-10 22:00:06 | Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-04-10 20:17:12 | Re: 2.6.26 kernel and PostgreSQL |