On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> You seem to be laboring under the delusion that this is considered a
> bug. It's a necessary semantic restriction, because the pushed-down
> expression could mean different things when applied to different
> data types.
Very true Tom, still I was hoping this could be seen as an improvement
- because in fact in my case it would be .
Thanks.
--
GJ