| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Craig Ringer" <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit |
| Date: | 2008-03-12 15:47:20 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0803120847k2e8afbedrc39e29e5194d3c6e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> Yep, patch attached. I also changed xactGetCommittedChildren to return
> the original array instead of copying it, as Alvaro suggested.
>
Any comments on the flag based approach I suggested earlier ? Am I
missing some normal scenario where it won't work well ?
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-12 15:57:19 | Re: [PERFORM] Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-12 14:35:12 | Re: [NOVICE] encoding problems |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-12 15:57:19 | Re: [PERFORM] Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit |
| Previous Message | Enrico Sirola | 2008-03-12 15:25:29 | 8.3 write performance |