Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)

From: "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)
Date: 2007-01-23 11:05:27
Message-ID: 2e78013d0701230305t18be2ed8ncdc80863e5439572@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/23/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Or so... :)
>
> I am sure there are more, the ones with question marks are unknowns but
> heard of in the ether somewhere. Any additions or confirmations?
>
>
I have the first phase of Frequent Update Optimizations (HOT) patch ready.
But I held it back because of the concerns that its too complex. It has
shown decent performance gains on pgbench and DBT2 tests though.

I am splitting the patch into smaller pieces for ease of review and would
submit those soon for comments.

Thanks,
Pavan

EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-01-23 11:25:35 Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work)
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-01-23 10:52:06 Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct