On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Right, but the question is: is there enough use-case left in it to
>> justify spending community effort on polishing rough edges? It's not
>> like we haven't got plenty else to do to get 9.0 out the door.
> The point I was trying to make is that I'm on the hook to do this particular
> job whether or not the community feels it's worthwhile. The only real
> decision is whether there's enough interest in upgrading this utility to
> review and possibly commit the result, and I'm trying to minimize the public
> resources needed even for those parts.
I'm interested as well, so happy to continue to work with you on it, Greg.
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
http://endpoint.com - work
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-01-28 01:13:49|
|Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO
on inherited columns|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-01-28 01:09:14|
|Subject: Re: testing cvs HEAD - HS/SR - missing file|