Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)

From: sanjay(dot)jain(at)minisoftindia(dot)com (Sanjay Jain)
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB + dotnet + replication)
Date: 2005-04-19 14:21:50
Message-ID: 2b4c2af1.0504190621.3cc63d30@posting.google.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Thanks 
Will do
We can host that Database on a Linux Platform

Regards
Sanjay

josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com (Josh Berkus) wrote in message news:<200504182036(dot)36600(dot)josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>...
> Sanjay,
> 
> > Also forgot to ask earlier
> > Will Postgres easily handle the 100GB+ database
> 
> Depends on what you mean by "easily".    I'd be very cautious about a 100GB+ 
> database on Windows.   We simply don't have much performance experience on 
> that platform.
> 
> That said, I know dozens of PG DBAs who are running 200GB or more databases on 
> Linux, BSD and Solaris.

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-04-19 16:26:13
Subject: PostgreSQL at LinuxTag
Previous:From: Jussi MikkolaDate: 2005-04-19 06:59:39
Subject: Re: Postgresql suitable replacement (Win 1GB / 100GB +

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group