Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6028: age() function output contracts "months", but not any other units.

From: "Martin A(dot) Brooks" <martin(at)antibodymx(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Martin A(dot) Brooks" <martin(at)antibodymx(dot)net>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6028: age() function output contracts "months", but not any other units.
Date: 2011-05-23 18:58:27
Message-ID: 2a599c2bb32e227b60867f89e0d8bd89.squirrel@olga.hinterlands.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Mon, May 23, 2011 19:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think possibly you misunderstand the scope of the breakage you're
> proposing.  This is not about the age() function.  It's interval_out()
> that's at stake, and so changing this would change the output formatting
> for *every* operation that yields intervals.  That makes it pretty
> high-risk.

I didn't, but now do, and can appreciate your caution.


Regards


Martin.



In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-05-23 18:59:02
Subject: Re: BUG #6027: OLE DB Provider not available
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-05-23 18:57:27
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6034: pg_upgrade fails when it should not.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group