On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am not happy, I thing so we do bigger chaos then it is. But it
> hasn't progress. So I agree with name string_agg. In this case isn't a
> problem rename this function if somebody would.
Could you not use CREATE AGGREGATE to create an alias named listagg if you needed it? Or are we limited to a single argument in that case?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tim Bunce||Date: 2010-01-25 19:31:10|
|Subject: Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]|
|Previous:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-01-25 19:27:57|
|Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate|