Re: Checking for a number

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Osvaldo Rosario Kussama <osvaldo_kussama(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Checking for a number
Date: 2007-06-27 21:59:51
Message-ID: 2CC541EC-CFBC-40ED-B0BB-967E517B1B5F@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Jun 27, 2007, at 16:17 , Richard Broersma Jr wrote:

>
> --- Osvaldo Rosario Kussama <osvaldo_kussama(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
>> Try:
>> SELECT your_field ~ '.*[[:digit:]]{2}$';
>
> This could be simplified a little. :o)
>
> WHERE your_field ~ '\\d{2}$';

Using dollar-quotes means not having to escape your \d (which I
always find a bit of a hassle):

WHERE your_field ~ $re$\d{2}$$re$;

It's important to remember to use a tagged dollar quote (e.g., $re$)
if you're using $ as an anchor.

And with standard_conforming_strings on you don't even need to use
dollar-quotes:

test=# show standard_conforming_strings;
standard_conforming_strings
-----------------------------
on
(1 row)

test=# select 'foo33' ~ '\d{2}$';
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)

Dollar-quoting gets you around having to worry about what
standard_conforming_strings is set to, though.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Danyelle Gragsone 2007-06-27 22:13:01 Re: postgres and webmin
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-27 21:50:40 Re: autovacumm not working ?