| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Date: | 2008-03-11 01:59:49 |
| Message-ID: | 2C136352-8D48-4556-8752-0974528FE551@langille.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
>> ... there should be two lists, of which you
>> would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
>
> I've been thinking that for awhile. Core is in a good position to see
> who are major or minor code contributors, but we are not so well
> placed
> to see who's contributing in a non-code fashion. If there's going to
> be recognition for non-code contributions I'd be happy to see that
> be a
> separate list managed by someone else. How this all gets presented on
> the website (one page or several?) is not clear.
I always like to look at how others have done this before.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/
index.html
--
Dan Langille -- http://www.langille.org/
dan(at)langille(dot)org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-03-11 02:04:59 | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-11 01:55:08 | Re: Contributor List policy |