Re: Dell Perc/6

From: Tore Halset <halset(at)pvv(dot)ntnu(dot)no>
To: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dell Perc/6
Date: 2008-02-13 10:02:23
Message-ID: 2BB8254A-6417-4B02-9239-90FC203D1E83@pvv.ntnu.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hello.

I think I started that discussion. We ended up buying a Dell 2900 with
PERC 6/i and 10 * 145GB SAS 3,5" 15KRpm discs. 6 of the SAS discs are
in a raid 10 for the database, 2 in a mirror for the wal and the last
2 in a mirror for the OS. We get 350MB/s writing and 380MB/s reading
to/from the raid 10 area using dd. The OS is Ubuntu and the filesystem
for the raid 10 is ext3.

The box is still under testing, but we plan to set it in production
this week.

Regards,
- Tore.

On Feb 12, 2008, at 17:32 , Craig James wrote:

> Does anyone have performance info about the new Dell Perc/6
> controllers? I found a long discussion ("Dell vs HP") about the
> Perc/5, but nothing about Perc/6. What's under the covers?
>
> Here is the (abbreviated) info from Dell on this machine:
> PowerEdge 1950 III Quad Core Intel® Xeon® E5405, 2x6MB Cache,
> 2.0GHz, 1333MHz FSB
> Additional Processors Quad Core Intel® Xeon® E5405, 2x6MB Cache,
> 2.0GHz, 1333MHz FSB
> Memory 8GB 667MHz (4x2GB), Dual Ranked DIMMs
> Hard Drive Configuration Integrated SAS/SATA RAID 5, PERC 6/i
> Integrated
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Linux Guru 2008-02-13 10:59:26 Re: Update with Subquery Performance
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2008-02-13 08:54:48 Re: Optimizing No matching record Queries