Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, markw(at)osdl(dot)org, kn(at)mgnet(dot)de, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Date: 2004-07-19 21:24:06
Message-ID: 29939.1090272246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> we need to check to see which one has a WAL eof-of-segment marker (we
> have on of those, right?).

No, we don't.

> I think I see a solution. We are going to create a file during backup so
> we know the wal offsets and xids. If we see that file, we know either
> we have a restore of a backup or they currently running a backup.

... or the last backup attempt failed, but they forgot to remove the
file it left. Or we are doing crash recovery after the system lost
power while a backup was running. Or half a dozen other obvious scenarios.

> If we tell them not to restore while a backup is running (seems pretty
> obvious) we can then delete pg_xlog when the backup wal offset file
> exists. In other cases, we know the WAL files are valid to use.

We're not deleting pg_xlog, period. IMHO it's too dangerous even to
have such a function in the code.

My original suggestion was to *replace* individual xlog files with data
extracted from archive, and only after determining that the archive
indeed has a copy of that particular file (and we can fetch it).
This at least has a fighting chance of not losing information. Wiping
pg_xlog in toto on the basis of a guess about the system status is just
a form of russian roulette. Sooner or later you will wipe some xlog
files that you can't get back from archive.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-07-19 21:26:50 Re: users connected
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-19 20:45:34 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-19 21:36:38 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-19 20:45:34 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-07-19 21:36:38 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2004-07-19 20:45:34 Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery