Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Asko Oja <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-28 22:48:24
Message-ID: 29907.1217285304@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> That said, this is no more of a deal than that text also has a default
> collation. You talk about "the database's default collation" but with
> proper collation support that statement is meaningless.

Well, we had better still be able to support the concept, or a lot
of applications that work fine today will fail.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-07-28 22:54:28
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2008-07-28 22:24:46
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group