Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> I think what you've really got here is inappropriate autovacuum cost
>> delay settings, and/or the logic in autovacuum.c to try to divvy up the
>> available I/O capacity by tweaking workers' delay settings isn't working
>> very well. It's hard to propose improvements without a lot more detail
>> than you've provided, though.
> Wait, we *have* that logic? If so, that's the problem ... it's not
> working very well.
> What detail do you want?
What's it doing? What do you think it should do instead?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-06-28 03:38:39|
|Subject: Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-06-28 03:20:43|
|Subject: Re: Server crash while trying to fetch EXPLAIN query results with a cursor|