Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dave Blasby <dblasby(at)refractions(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes
Date: 2001-09-06 04:49:54
Message-ID: 29856.999751794@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
I wrote:
> I propose that we define typdefault as containing the *external*
> representation of the desired value, and have get_typdefault apply the
> type's input conversion function to produce a Datum.  Any objections?

This change is committed for 7.2.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-06 05:03:21
Subject: Re: Is there a problem running vacuum in the middle of a transaction?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-06 04:04:14
Subject: Re: Log rotation?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group