| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)Postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Creating an aggregate function |
| Date: | 2000-09-09 21:03:36 |
| Message-ID: | 29842.968533416@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Roberto Mello <rmello(at)cc(dot)usu(dot)edu> writes:
> and our output was:
> date_id | n_sessions_day | members | non_members
> ---------+----------------+-----------+-------------
> 1 | 500 | 30 | 136394044
> 2 | 2000 | 136394612 | 136394612
In current sources I get the expected results if I write the
CREATE AGGREGATE commands with
initcond1 = '0');
Although the parser will accept unquoted integers as initcond
inputs, it looks like something downstream is mishandling them,
resulting in an invalid initial value entered into the pg_aggregate
entry for the aggregate.
I'll look into fixing that for 7.1, but in the meantime try putting
quotes around the initial values.
BTW, your agg_if_member function is not very good, because if it gets
more than one input row with member_p = 1 then the result is order-
dependent. You don't want that.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Max Pyziur | 2000-09-10 18:19:08 | "ORDER BY" issue - is this a bug? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-09 16:59:47 | Re: [SQL] Porting from mysql to psql (UNIX_TIMESTAMP()?) |