Re: ice-broker scan thread

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Date: 2005-11-29 04:01:53
Message-ID: 29795.1133236913@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO

Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
worth the trouble.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Boreham 2005-11-29 04:09:55 Re: ice-broker scan thread
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-11-29 03:56:08 Re: ice-broker scan thread