Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ice-broker scan thread

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Date: 2005-11-29 04:01:53
Message-ID: 29795.1133236913@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO

Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
this in.  Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
worth the trouble.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David BorehamDate: 2005-11-29 04:09:55
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-11-29 03:56:08
Subject: Re: ice-broker scan thread

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group