Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: small exclusion constraints patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small exclusion constraints patch
Date: 2010-05-30 17:33:16
Message-ID: 29732.1275240796@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... The fact that not very many people will want to do
> something is not a reason to prevent it.

It's not about preventing it for no reason.  The proposed patch removes a
significant sanity check from code that still hasn't gotten out of beta.
I might be willing to remove it in 9.1; I am *not* willing to remove it
from 9.0.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-05-30 17:51:16
Subject: Re: pg_trgm
Previous:From: Greg StarkDate: 2010-05-30 16:59:25
Subject: Re: pg_trgm

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group