Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-27 20:50:23
Message-ID: 29708.1267303823@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
=?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
> Le 27 fvr. 2010  17:57, Tom Lane a crit :
>> I don't think it's our bug to fix.

> It would mean retiring pika until/if the bug is fixed... :-(

Grumble ... well, I suppose we've put in worse platform-specific hacks
elsewhere.  At least this is pretty localized.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2010-02-27 21:04:31
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-02-27 20:31:06
Subject: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication integration

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group