Re: ecpg.addons

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg.addons
Date: 2009-11-26 16:14:54
Message-ID: 2960.1259252094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I wrote a hackish little script that checks if all rules in ecpg.addons are
> indeed used to create the precompiler's parser to catch renamed symbol and
> similar changes. Now I wonder whether this should be added to the build
> process. If it is, the buildfarm will catch every such change, not just the
> ones breaking the regression tests. However, this might also make the buildfarm
> become red if only a very minor and unimportant change is not syncronized.

> Any comment?

The point of the buildfarm is to catch mistakes ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • ecpg.addons at 2009-11-26 16:00:28 from Michael Meskes

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2009-11-26 16:34:21 Re: KNNGiST for knn-search (WIP)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-26 16:07:54 Re: cvs chapters in our docs