Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Log rotation?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Log rotation?
Date: 2001-09-06 04:04:14
Message-ID: 29597.999749054@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
>> 
>> Why not?

> The standard implementations of syslog lose log entries under heavy
> load,

Okay, that's a sufficient answer for that point.

> (My personal preference these days is an approach like DJB's
> daemontools, which separates the handling of log entries from the
> program doing the logging.)

That still leads back to my first question, which is whether we can't
rely on someone else's logrotation code.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-09-06 04:49:54
Subject: Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes
Previous:From: Ian Lance TaylorDate: 2001-09-06 03:54:44
Subject: Re: Log rotation?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group