Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robert(dot)haas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo
Date: 2012-03-21 13:54:53
Message-ID: 29572.1332338093@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 21.03.2012 01:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo.

> Shouldn't this be backported? Without it, vacuumlo is effectively broken 
> in 9.0 and 9.1.

I was wondering about that.  You could argue for either "it's a new
feature" or "it's a bug fix".  It's a simple enough change that I see
little risk in it, so the argument against backporting seems weak.

If there are not objections, I'll just copy the current vacuumlo code
in toto into 9.0 and 9.1.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-03-21 13:59:49
Subject: Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-21 13:26:58
Subject: Re: Memory usage during sorting

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-03-21 14:58:07
Subject: pgsql: Improve connectMaintenanceDatabase() error reporting.
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2012-03-21 07:10:28
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve the -l (limit) option recently added to contrib/vacuumlo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group