Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Date: 2001-05-15 04:25:01
Message-ID: 29487.989900701@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> How does GIST set this field?

I didn't say GIST *set* it, I said GIST *used* it --- and your patch
would've changed GIST's behavior.

Perhaps the field is not really necessary, but some detailed analysis
would be required to establish that. I'm not very clear on what GIST
is doing with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-05-15 04:27:43 Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Previous Message Justin Clift 2001-05-15 03:58:39 Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib