Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Date: 2001-05-15 04:25:01
Message-ID: 29487.989900701@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> How does GIST set this field?

I didn't say GIST *set* it, I said GIST *used* it --- and your patch
would've changed GIST's behavior.

Perhaps the field is not really necessary, but some detailed analysis
would be required to establish that.  I'm not very clear on what GIST
is doing with it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-05-15 04:27:43
Subject: Re: Remove columns pg_index.haskeytype and pg_index.indisclustered
Previous:From: Justin CliftDate: 2001-05-15 03:58:39
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group