Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
>> Make the world safe for atttypmod=0 ... this didn't use to mean anything,
>> but timestamp now wants it to mean something.

> What was the effect of this?

coerce_type_typemod thought that typmod=0 meant it shouldn't perform any
length coercion.  But typmod=0 is now a valid value for timestamp ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: pgsql/src/backend parser/parse_coerce.c utils/ ... at 2001-10-04 17:57:59 from Thomas Lockhart

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-10-04 18:13:29
	Subject: Re: timestamp resolution?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2001-10-04 18:03:13
	Subject: Unhappiness with forced precision conversion for timestamp

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: tgl	Date: 2001-10-04 19:13:56
	Subject: pgsql/src/backend/utils/fmgr dfmgr.c
Previous:	From: Thomas Lockhart	Date: 2001-10-04 17:57:59
	Subject: Re: pgsql/src/backend parser/parse_coerce.c utils/ ...