From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
Date: | 2004-07-11 15:01:39 |
Message-ID: | 29428.1089558099@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Either changing the command tag or let COMMIT of an aborted transaction
> fail (and stay in aborted transaction state). Those are the only two
> clean ways to communicate to the client "no, I cannot commit".
Well, the latter would *certainly* create compatibility problems, so
I don't find it preferable ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-11 19:14:38 | Re: Dump/Restore of cvs regression database gives invalid timestamp syntax error |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-07-11 14:01:09 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-11 15:17:19 | Re: plperl (7.5) |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-07-11 14:01:09 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #1118: Misleading Commit message |