Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OUTER keyword

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OUTER keyword
Date: 2011-02-22 15:10:50
Message-ID: 29368.1298387450@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On 22.02.2011 16:58, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> It this a TODO?

> If we want to change OUTER, we should just do it now. If not, I don't 
> see a TODO here.

I don't see a good reason to change it.  The SQL standard is perfectly
clear that OUTER is a fully reserved word.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-22 15:13:59
Subject: Re: OUTER keyword
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2011-02-22 15:01:21
Subject: Re: OUTER keyword

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group