Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
Date: 2008-01-03 07:14:49
Message-ID: 29362.1199344489@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I actually mean to say that DDLs can be declared as self-committing.

Egad, an Oracle lover in our midst.

Most of us think that roll-back-able DDL is one of the best features of
Postgres, and certainly one of our best selling points vis-a-vis Oracle.
Don't expect us to give it up.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Gokulakannan SomasundaramDate: 2008-01-03 07:38:47
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers
Previous:From: Gokulakannan SomasundaramDate: 2008-01-03 07:04:00
Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group