| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) |
| Date: | 2003-09-25 14:17:04 |
| Message-ID: | 2929.1064499424@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> writes:
> FWIW, I've got a threaded version of the WIN32_DEV branch more or less
> "running" (it is a terrible hack job, so NO, no patches... yet :-), as a
> proof of concept. Still a work in progress (ok, I've qualified it enough),
> but it is showing enough promise to convince me that threading is the way to
> go for the Win32 port.
How are you dealing with the issue of wanting some static variables to
be per-thread and others not?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-25 14:28:40 | Re: Is this a commit problem? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-09-25 14:14:50 | Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-09-25 14:47:23 | Re: Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for window |
| Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-09-25 14:12:32 | Threads vs Processes (was: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows) |