Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1671: Long interval string representation rejected

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Dilger <markdilger(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1671: Long interval string representation rejected
Date: 2005-05-19 05:49:54
Message-ID: 29259.1116481794@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> your handwaving has yet to convince me :)

Zing ;-)

I'm too tired to think about this more tonight, but it seems like
the basic point is that we can't just construct a list of pointers
into (a copy of) the original input string.  A certain amount of
data copying is going to have to occur; or else we change the
token matching code to not assume null-termination.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Vincent VanwynsbergheDate: 2005-05-19 08:49:14
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Bug Report with Postgres 7.4 on AIX 5.3
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-05-19 05:30:15
Subject: Re: BUG #1671: Long interval string representation rejected

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group