From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |
Date: | 2008-04-03 14:18:56 |
Message-ID: | 29194.1207232336@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I thinking about new directory structure (some like)
> pl/sqlsp/ .. sql Stored Procedures
> pl/sqlsp/utils
> pl/sqlsp/plpgsql - only plpgpsm code
> pl/sqlsp/plpgpsm - only plpgsql code
Maybe "common" instead of "utils"?
Also, where did "plpgpsm" come from? This is supposed to be a standard,
so there is no reason to designate it as PG-specific. plpsm seems the
right name.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-03 14:35:54 | Re: psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-03 14:14:38 | Re: [PATCHES] Re: BUG #4070: Join more then ~15 tables let postgreSQL produces wrong data |