Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options
Date: 2005-12-16 20:56:07
Message-ID: 29192.1134766567@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 13:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would -1 work, or just confuse people?

> That was my preference, I just thought it wouldn't be popular...
> So I'll happily change that.

OK.  While you're at it, I didn't like the long name either ;-).
We do not use the abbrevation txn anywhere, so I think it's bad to
introduce it here.  I'd vote for spelling out --single-transaction,
or maybe just --single.  I believe you can abbreviate long switch names
to any unique prefix, so there's not really any more typing here.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Mark KirkwoodDate: 2005-12-16 21:17:54
Subject: Re: TODO Item - Add system view to show free space map
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-12-16 20:53:36
Subject: Re: Single-Transaction Utility options

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group