"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> This could work out well with my upcoming patch to have \df only
> show non-system functions. Since the user will in the future have
> to explicitly call \dfS to see the system functions, 60 extra
> out of 1700 should not matter too much.

Uh, who exactly agreed to that?  I know when I do \df it's generally
to check out built-in functions not my own.  I don't see this as an
improvement.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 00:08:43 from Greg Sabino Mullane

Responses

• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 04:59:43 from Christopher Kings-Lynne
• Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments at 2005-04-01 12:08:54 from Greg Sabino Mullane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-04-01 04:53:18
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-04-01 02:56:12
	Subject: New FLOSS survey

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2005-04-01 04:53:18
	Subject: Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-04-01 02:22:33
	Subject: Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL