Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?
Date: 2000-12-30 04:20:58
Message-ID: 29144.978150058@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-general

"Thomas T. Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> writes:
> PLEASE NOTE: I'm brand new to PostgreSQL as of today. I've just moved from
> MySQL because it's not stable on NetBSD/Alpha. I don't know enough about
> pgsql to see if these failed test would make it unstable for production.

Postgres 7.0.* will not work very well on Alpha unless you apply Ryan
Kirkpatrick's patch set (I forget the URL offhand, but dig around in our
archives and you'll find it). 7.1 should be a lot better. If you'd
like to help out testing 7.1, please grab current sources from the CVS
server, or grab a snapshot tarball dated tomorrow or later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-30 04:55:10 Re: AIX 4.3.1, 7.0.3 build annoyances: C++ comments, make all, macro problem
Previous Message pgsql-bugs 2000-12-30 03:40:44 AIX 4.3.1 build, need to manually copy postgres.imp for tcl linking

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-30 04:31:36 Re: Error opening pgaccess
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2000-12-30 04:14:14 Re: Re: Failed Statements within Transactions