| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2 release schedule |
| Date: | 2012-07-23 14:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 29131.1343053746@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
> things from the list of open items. I don't think all of the things
> listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
> to be done about some of the things that are there.
I've got the libpq row processor thing. That and the CHECK NO INHERIT
syntax thing are definitely release-blockers, because we won't be able
to change such decisions post-release (well, we could, but the pain to
benefit ratio is bad). I guess the SPGiST vs HS issue is a blocker too.
A lot of the rest look like pre-existing bugs to me.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-07-23 14:37:56 | Re: enhanced error fields |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-07-23 14:23:35 | Re: enhanced error fields |