Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 9.2 release schedule

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.2 release schedule
Date: 2012-07-23 14:29:06
Message-ID: 29131.1343053746@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
> things from the list of open items.  I don't think all of the things
> listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
> to be done about some of the things that are there.

I've got the libpq row processor thing.  That and the CHECK NO INHERIT
syntax thing are definitely release-blockers, because we won't be able
to change such decisions post-release (well, we could, but the pain to
benefit ratio is bad).  I guess the SPGiST vs HS issue is a blocker too.
A lot of the rest look like pre-existing bugs to me.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-07-23 14:37:56
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-23 14:23:35
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group