Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_dump sort order for functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump sort order for functions
Date: 2010-02-15 15:15:17
Message-ID: 29048.1266246917@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Since we ran out of time/ideas on this, I would propose just committing
> the part that breaks ties based on the number of arguments, which
> already solves a large part of the problem (at least in a pre-default
> values world) and would very likely be a part of any possible future
> utterly complete solution.

Seems safe enough.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2010-02-15 15:15:24
Subject: Re: TCP keepalive support for libpq
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-15 15:10:57
Subject: Re: plperl message style on newly added messages

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group