Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> We have discovered an interesting locking scenario with Slony-I that
> is pointing to a use for the ability to exclude certain schemas from
> The situation is that when a "full" pg_dump kicks off, a Slony-I
> "create sync" event, which expects to "LOCK slony_schema.sl_event;",
> is blocked from getting the exclusive lock that it desires.
Perhaps this should be seen as a Slony bug. Does it really need an
AccessExclusive lock, or would an Exclusive lock do?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-09-16 18:12:40|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems with SPI memory management |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2004-09-16 15:43:17|
|Subject: Re: subtransaction assert failure |