Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com>
Cc: Horák Daniel <horak(at)sit(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Date: 2001-01-15 22:23:20
Message-ID: 29018.979597400@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports
Jason Tishler <Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com> writes:
> I've already tested the no postmaster case.  Please be more explicit
> regarding "connecting to a nonexistent socket" and etc.  I'm afraid that
> if I guess then I'll miss something.

The cases I was thinking of were (a) no socket file (normal case if no
postmaster) and (b) socket file present but no postmaster attached ---
you can get that by kill -9'ing the postmaster ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-16 03:56:50
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch
Previous:From: Jason TishlerDate: 2001-01-15 21:59:00
Subject: Re: Cygwin PostgreSQL CVS Patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group