Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Date: 2011-02-28 20:03:33
Message-ID: 28962.1298923413@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> Em 28-02-2011 15:50, Tom Lane escreveu:
>> Ultimately we need to think of a reporting mechanism that's a bit
>> smarter than "rewrite the whole file for any update" ...

> What about splitting statistic file per database?

That would improve matters for some usage patterns, but I'm afraid
only a minority.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-28 20:24:41
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-28 20:02:30
Subject: Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group